Welcome to Shaanxi Qianyi Tuoda Technology Co., Ltd
EnglishРусский中文
  • Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 Mill Certificate | Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265
Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 Mill Certificate | Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265

Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 Mill Certificate | Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265

Specificationtitanium plate with EN 10204 3.1 mill certificate, Gr2 titanium plate MTC 3.1, TA2 titanium sheet EN 10204 3.1, ASTM B265 titanium plate mill test certificate, titanium plate heat number traceability,

Product Description: Titanium plate with EN 10204 3.1 mill certificate from Baoji stock. Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265, heat-number traceable, actual chemistry + mechanical test values, cut-to-size, same-day dispatch. Quote within 24

Request a Quote Contact Sales

Product Overview

Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 Mill Certificate | Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265

Meta Description: Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 mill certificate from Baoji stock. Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265, heat-number traceable, actual chemistry + mechanical test values, cut-to-size, same-day dispatch on confirmed in-stock orders. Quote within 24h.

Overview

For EPC teams, pressure-vessel fabricators, and overseas procurement, the material is only as good as its paper trail. We are a Baoji-based titanium inventory holder with 800 tons total titanium stock, including ~400 tons of Titanium Plate/sheet. Every Gr2/TA2 plate we ship against an MTC requirement carries an EN 10204 Type 3.1 inspection certificate — issued by the original mill's independent inspection function, tied to the actual heat number on the plate, not a generic declaration. This page explains what 3.1 really means, what the certificate contains, how we keep traceability through cutting, and how to specify it correctly on a PO.

What EN 10204 3.1 Actually Means

EN 10204 defines the format and verification level of an inspection document — it does not replace ASTM B265 or GB/T 3621 (those define the material spec). Under EN 10204:

  • 3.1 = Inspection Certificate: actual test results from the specific heat/lot supplied, validated by the manufacturer's authorized inspection representative (independent of the production department)
  • Contains specific chemistry + mechanical values for the delivered heat — not a "similar batch" result
  • Signed/stamped by the mill's QA/inspection function
  • No third-party witness required (that is 3.2)

In plain terms: a 3.1 MTC answers "Is this exact plate what you claim, and can you prove it from this heat?" — yes, with test data.

3.1 vs 2.1 vs 2.2 vs 3.2 (Buyer Short Version)

Type Test data on actual heat Who signs When used
2.1 No Manufacturer (declaration only) Non-critical commodity
2.2 Yes, but non-specific batch Manufacturer General industrial, low-consequence
3.1 Yes, specific heat Mill's independent inspection rep Pressure vessel / HX / desalination / export
3.2 Yes, specific heat Mill + third party (SGS/BV/TÜV) Nuclear, classified, client-mandated

Most industrial projects (PED, ASME auxiliary material dossiers, desalination EPC) accept 3.1 as the standard level. 3.2 is only arranged when the PO or end-user spec explicitly demands a third-party counter-signature.

What Our 3.1 MTC Contains

  • Product identification: grade, standard (ASTM B265 / GB/T 3621), thickness×width×length, quantity
  • Heat / cast number: the same number etched/tagged on the physical plate
  • Chemical composition: Fe, O, N, C, H, Ti-balance (melt analysis, actual values)
  • Mechanical properties: tensile strength, 0.2% yield, elongation (Gr2: ≥345 / ≥275 / ≥20%)
  • Heat-treatment condition: annealed (M)
  • NDT records: UT for thick plate (≥20mm) where specified
  • Surface & dimensional: referenced to order acceptance
  • Signature/ stamp: mill QA inspector, English PDF

Traceability Through Cutting (The Part Most Suppliers Break)

A certificate is useless if the heat number is lost during cutting. Our rule:

  1. Stock plate tagged with heat number before entering cutting area
  2. Cut pieces retain heat-number tag / etching after shear/waterjet
  3. MTC heat number = physical tag number = PI line item
  4. Multi-piece cuts from one mother plate: all pieces carry the same heat reference
  5. If heat number is partially removed by machining, we re-mark by dot-peen/etch and note it on the dispatch report

No grade substitution. No "certificate swapped from another heat." Traceability is the whole point of 3.1.

Stock Scope Covered by MTC 3.1

Item Coverage
Gr2 / TA2 plate 0.5–50mm 3.1 standard with stock shipment
Gr1 / Gr4 / Gr7 / Gr12 3.1 from mill, lead time confirmed per heat
Gr5 / TC4 3.1 with AMS/GB dual reference on request
Cut-to-size pieces Same heat number carried; MTC references mother-heat
Third-party (SGS/BV/TÜV) 3.2 arranged at buyer cost, witnessed test

How to Specify MTC 3.1 on Your PO

Copy this into your purchase order / enquiry to avoid ambiguity:

Material: Titanium Plate, Gr2 (TA2)
Standard: ASTM B265 / ASME SB265 (edition stated)
Condition: Annealed (M)
Dimensions: ___ × ___ × ___ mm (or cut-to-size list)
Quantity: ___ kg / ___ pcs
Certificate: EN 10204 Type 3.1, English PDF
Heat number: marked on each piece
Docs: MTC 3.1 + COO + Packing List + CI
Third-party inspection: SGS / BV / none
Non-Russian-origin declaration: yes / no (EU customs)

EU / Export Clearance Notes

  • 3.1 PDF in English (or English translation attached)
  • Heat-number consistency is the first thing EU/QAR inspectors check
  • For EU-bound metal goods, a non-Russian-origin statement can be added on request (stated separately from the 3.1 technical content)
  • COO, commercial invoice, packing list supplied in parallel
  • SGS/BV/TÜV witness available — we schedule test window, buyer covers third-party fee

Cutting + Certificate Workflow

  1. Enquiry with grade + dims + "MTC 3.1 required"
  2. We confirm stock heat availability (not just "Gr2 in warehouse" — actual heat)
  3. Quotation cites heat number range / mill source
  4. PO confirmed → cutting from tagged stock
  5. Deburr + flatness check + heat-number re-affirmation
  6. MTC 3.1 drafted against delivered heat, QA sign-off
  7. Crate sealed, docs emailed as PDF + hard copy in crate

Common Mistakes Buyers Should Avoid

  • Writing "MTC" without stating EN 10204 type → defaults get messy; always write "3.1" or "3.2"
  • Accepting 2.2 as 3.1 — different verification level, not interchangeable
  • Cutting off the heat-number tag before inspection → traceability breaks
  • Asking a trader to "issue" a 3.1 themselves → only the mill's independent inspection function issues a true 3.1; stockists supply the mill's 3.1
  • Mixing heats in one bundle without separate MTC lines

Quality Controls Before Doc Release

  • Heat number on plate ↔ MTC ↔ PI ↔ crate tag cross-checked by QA
  • Thickness micrometer (4-point + center)
  • Flatness ≤3mm/m after leveling
  • UT for ≥20mm plate where specified
  • Surface: pickled/oxide-removed, no carbon-steel contact
  • PDF MTC sent for review before final dispatch on large orders

Typical Projects Requiring 3.1

Project type Why 3.1 is mandatory
Pressure vessel / heat exchanger ASME/PED material dossier needs heat-specific test data
Desalination (MSF/MED) Chloride service, EPC vendor-doc control
Chemical reactor Traceability for audit + insurance
Oil & gas skid Client QA spec, NACE/PED linkage
EU import Customs + CE/PED supporting evidence
Nuclear/aerospace Usually 3.2 + NADCAP — quoted separately

FAQ — Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1

Q1: Do you issue the 3.1 yourself?
A: We supply the original mill's EN 10204 3.1 (issued by the mill's independent inspection function), tied to the actual heat. We do not fabricate a "trader version" and call it a mill 3.1.

Q2: If you cut the plate, does the MTC still match?
A: Yes. Heat number travels with the piece. MTC references the mother-heat; cut pieces carry the same heat ID.

Q3: Can I get 3.2 instead of 3.1?
A: Yes. SGS/BV/TÜV witness arranged at buyer cost; lead time extends by the third-party schedule.

Q4: Is 3.1 enough for ASME pressure parts?
A: For material certification, 3.1 is the standard level for most industrial applications. Final acceptance is governed by the ASME stamp holder / client QA plan.

Q5: Do you add non-Russian-origin statement for EU?
A: On request, as a separate declaration alongside the 3.1 (not altering the technical certificate content).

Q6: What if my PO heat number must match a previous project heat?
A: Tell us the heat number; we check live stock. If not available, we propose equivalent heat with full 3.1 for your QA review before cutting.

Q7: Language of certificate?
A: English PDF standard. Bilingual (EN+CN) on request.

Q8: How fast can docs release?
A: For in-stock heat + standard cut: MTC drafted same dispatch cycle; PDF sent before crate closes on large orders.

Q9: Can MTC cover multiple pieces in one line?
A: Yes, if same heat + same grade + same order. Different heats = separate MTC lines (no mixing).

Q10: Sample coupon with cert?
A: 100×100mm coupon from same heat, MTC excerpt/reference supplied, courier at cost, deductible from bulk PO.

Request a Quote (MTC-Specific)

Email: sales@[yourdomain].com

Send:

  1. Grade + standard (ASTM B265 / GB/T 3621)
  2. Thickness × width × length + qty
  3. "EN 10204 3.1" explicitly on the enquiry
  4. Heat-number preference (specific / any in-stock heat)
  5. Third-party inspection: none / SGS / BV / TÜV
  6. Destination + EU origin-declaration need (yes/no)

Reply within 24 working hours: live heat availability + EXW/FOB quote + doc plan.


About: Baoji Titanium Valley inventory holder. ~400 tons titanium plate within 800-ton total stock. Gr2/TA2 titanium plate supplied with EN 10204 Type 3.1 mill certificate — heat-number traceable, actual chemistry/mechanical values, cut-to-size, export packed, same-day dispatch on confirmed in-stock orders.

<h1>Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1 Mill Certificate | Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265</h1> <p><strong>Meta Description:</strong> Titanium plate with EN 10204 3.1 mill certificate from Baoji stock. Gr2/TA2 ASTM B265, heat-number traceable, actual chemistry + mechanical test values, cut-to-size, same-day dispatch on confirmed in-stock orders. Quote within 24h.</p> <h2>Overview</h2> <p>For EPC teams, pressure-vessel fabricators, and overseas procurement, the material is only as good as its paper trail. We are a Baoji-based titanium inventory holder with <strong>800 tons total titanium stock, including ~400 tons of titanium plate/sheet</strong>. Every Gr2/TA2 plate we ship against an MTC requirement carries an <strong>EN 10204 Type 3.1 inspection certificate</strong> — issued by the original mill's independent inspection function, tied to the actual heat number on the plate, not a generic declaration. This page explains what 3.1 really means, what the certificate contains, how we keep traceability through cutting, and how to specify it correctly on a PO.</p> <h2>What EN 10204 3.1 Actually Means</h2> <p>EN 10204 defines the <em>format and verification level</em> of an inspection document — it does not replace ASTM B265 or GB/T 3621 (those define the material spec). Under EN 10204:</p> <ul> <li><strong>3.1 = Inspection Certificate:</strong> actual test results from the specific heat/lot supplied, validated by the manufacturer's authorized inspection representative (independent of the production department)</li> <li>Contains <strong>specific</strong> chemistry + mechanical values for the delivered heat — not a "similar batch" result</li> <li>Signed/stamped by the mill's QA/inspection function</li> <li>No third-party witness required (that is 3.2)</li> </ul> <p>In plain terms: a 3.1 MTC answers "Is this exact plate what you claim, and can you prove it from this heat?" — yes, with test data.</p> <h2>3.1 vs 2.1 vs 2.2 vs 3.2 (Buyer Short Version)</h2> <table border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;"> <tr><th>Type</th><th>Test data on actual heat</th><th>Who signs</th><th>When used</th></tr> <tr><td>2.1</td><td>No</td><td>Manufacturer (declaration only)</td><td>Non-critical commodity</td></tr> <tr><td>2.2</td><td>Yes, but non-specific batch</td><td>Manufacturer</td><td>General industrial, low-consequence</td></tr> <tr><td><strong>3.1</strong></td><td><strong>Yes, specific heat</strong></td><td><strong>Mill's independent inspection rep</strong></td><td><strong>Pressure vessel / HX / desalination / export</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>3.2</td><td>Yes, specific heat</td><td>Mill + third party (SGS/BV/TÜV)</td><td>Nuclear, classified, client-mandated</td></tr> </table> <p>Most industrial projects (PED, ASME auxiliary material dossiers, desalination EPC) accept 3.1 as the standard level. 3.2 is only arranged when the PO or end-user spec explicitly demands a third-party counter-signature.</p> <h2>What Our 3.1 MTC Contains</h2> <ul> <li><strong>Product identification:</strong> grade, standard (ASTM B265 / GB/T 3621), thickness×width×length, quantity</li> <li><strong>Heat / cast number:</strong> the same number etched/tagged on the physical plate</li> <li><strong>Chemical composition:</strong> Fe, O, N, C, H, Ti-balance (melt analysis, actual values)</li> <li><strong>Mechanical properties:</strong> tensile strength, 0.2% yield, elongation (Gr2: ≥345 / ≥275 / ≥20%)</li> <li><strong>Heat-treatment condition:</strong> annealed (M)</li> <li><strong>NDT records:</strong> UT for thick plate (≥20mm) where specified</li> <li><strong>Surface & dimensional:</strong> referenced to order acceptance</li> <li><strong>Signature/ stamp:</strong> mill QA inspector, English PDF</li> </ul> <h2>Traceability Through Cutting (The Part Most Suppliers Break)</h2> <p>A certificate is useless if the heat number is lost during cutting. Our rule:</p> <ol> <li>Stock plate tagged with heat number before entering cutting area</li> <li>Cut pieces retain heat-number tag / etching after shear/waterjet</li> <li>MTC heat number = physical tag number = PI line item</li> <li>Multi-piece cuts from one mother plate: all pieces carry the same heat reference</li> <li>If heat number is partially removed by machining, we re-mark by dot-peen/etch and note it on the dispatch report</li> </ol> <p>No grade substitution. No "certificate swapped from another heat." Traceability is the whole point of 3.1.</p> <h2>Stock Scope Covered by MTC 3.1</h2> <table border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;"> <tr><th>Item</th><th>Coverage</th></tr> <tr><td>Gr2 / TA2 plate 0.5–50mm</td><td>3.1 standard with stock shipment</td></tr> <tr><td>Gr1 / Gr4 / Gr7 / Gr12</td><td>3.1 from mill, lead time confirmed per heat</td></tr> <tr><td>Gr5 / TC4</td><td>3.1 with AMS/GB dual reference on request</td></tr> <tr><td>Cut-to-size pieces</td><td>Same heat number carried; MTC references mother-heat</td></tr> <tr><td>Third-party (SGS/BV/TÜV)</td><td>3.2 arranged at buyer cost, witnessed test</td></tr> </table> <h2>How to Specify MTC 3.1 on Your PO</h2> <p>Copy this into your purchase order / enquiry to avoid ambiguity:</p> <pre> Material: Titanium plate, Gr2 (TA2) Standard: ASTM B265 / ASME SB265 (edition stated) Condition: Annealed (M) Dimensions: ___ × ___ × ___ mm (or cut-to-size list) Quantity: ___ kg / ___ pcs Certificate: EN 10204 Type 3.1, English PDF Heat number: marked on each piece Docs: MTC 3.1 + COO + Packing List + CI Third-party inspection: SGS / BV / none Non-Russian-origin declaration: yes / no (EU customs) </pre> <h2>EU / Export Clearance Notes</h2> <ul> <li>3.1 PDF in English (or English translation attached)</li> <li>Heat-number consistency is the first thing EU/QAR inspectors check</li> <li>For EU-bound metal goods, a non-Russian-origin statement can be added on request (stated separately from the 3.1 technical content)</li> <li>COO, commercial invoice, packing list supplied in parallel</li> <li>SGS/BV/TÜV witness available — we schedule test window, buyer covers third-party fee</li> </ul> <h2>Cutting + Certificate Workflow</h2> <ol> <li>Enquiry with grade + dims + "MTC 3.1 required"</li> <li>We confirm stock heat availability (not just "Gr2 in warehouse" — actual heat)</li> <li>Quotation cites heat number range / mill source</li> <li>PO confirmed → cutting from tagged stock</li> <li>Deburr + flatness check + heat-number re-affirmation</li> <li>MTC 3.1 drafted against delivered heat, QA sign-off</li> <li>Crate sealed, docs emailed as PDF + hard copy in crate</li> </ol> <h2>Common Mistakes Buyers Should Avoid</h2> <ul> <li>Writing "MTC" without stating EN 10204 type → defaults get messy; always write "3.1" or "3.2"</li> <li>Accepting 2.2 as 3.1 — different verification level, not interchangeable</li> <li>Cutting off the heat-number tag before inspection → traceability breaks</li> <li>Asking a trader to "issue" a 3.1 themselves → only the mill's independent inspection function issues a true 3.1; stockists supply the mill's 3.1</li> <li>Mixing heats in one bundle without separate MTC lines</li> </ul> <h2>Quality Controls Before Doc Release</h2> <ul> <li>Heat number on plate ↔ MTC ↔ PI ↔ crate tag cross-checked by QA</li> <li>Thickness micrometer (4-point + center)</li> <li>Flatness ≤3mm/m after leveling</li> <li>UT for ≥20mm plate where specified</li> <li>Surface: pickled/oxide-removed, no carbon-steel contact</li> <li>PDF MTC sent for review before final dispatch on large orders</li> </ul> <h2>Typical Projects Requiring 3.1</h2> <table border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;"> <tr><th>Project type</th><th>Why 3.1 is mandatory</th></tr> <tr><td>Pressure vessel / heat exchanger</td><td>ASME/PED material dossier needs heat-specific test data</td></tr> <tr><td>Desalination (MSF/MED)</td><td>Chloride service, EPC vendor-doc control</td></tr> <tr><td>Chemical reactor</td><td>Traceability for audit + insurance</td></tr> <tr><td>Oil & gas skid</td><td>Client QA spec, NACE/PED linkage</td></tr> <tr><td>EU import</td><td>Customs + CE/PED supporting evidence</td></tr> <tr><td>Nuclear/aerospace</td><td>Usually 3.2 + NADCAP — quoted separately</td></tr> </table> <h2>FAQ — Titanium Plate with EN 10204 3.1</h2> <p><strong>Q1: Do you issue the 3.1 yourself?</strong><br> A: We supply the original mill's EN 10204 3.1 (issued by the mill's independent inspection function), tied to the actual heat. We do not fabricate a "trader version" and call it a mill 3.1.</p> <p><strong>Q2: If you cut the plate, does the MTC still match?</strong><br> A: Yes. Heat number travels with the piece. MTC references the mother-heat; cut pieces carry the same heat ID.</p> <p><strong>Q3: Can I get 3.2 instead of 3.1?</strong><br> A: Yes. SGS/BV/TÜV witness arranged at buyer cost; lead time extends by the third-party schedule.</p> <p><strong>Q4: Is 3.1 enough for ASME pressure parts?</strong><br> A: For material certification, 3.1 is the standard level for most industrial applications. Final acceptance is governed by the ASME stamp holder / client QA plan.</p> <p><strong>Q5: Do you add non-Russian-origin statement for EU?</strong><br> A: On request, as a separate declaration alongside the 3.1 (not altering the technical certificate content).</p> <p><strong>Q6: What if my PO heat number must match a previous project heat?</strong><br> A: Tell us the heat number; we check live stock. If not available, we propose equivalent heat with full 3.1 for your QA review before cutting.</p> <p><strong>Q7: Language of certificate?</strong><br> A: English PDF standard. Bilingual (EN+CN) on request.</p> <p><strong>Q8: How fast can docs release?</strong><br> A: For in-stock heat + standard cut: MTC drafted same dispatch cycle; PDF sent before crate closes on large orders.</p> <p><strong>Q9: Can MTC cover multiple pieces in one line?</strong><br> A: Yes, if same heat + same grade + same order. Different heats = separate MTC lines (no mixing).</p> <p><strong>Q10: Sample coupon with cert?</strong><br> A: 100×100mm coupon from same heat, MTC excerpt/reference supplied, courier at cost, deductible from bulk PO.</p> <h2>Request a Quote (MTC-Specific)</h2> <p>Email: <strong>sales@[yourdomain].com</strong></p> <p>Send:</p> <ol> <li>Grade + standard (ASTM B265 / GB/T 3621)</li> <li>Thickness × width × length + qty</li> <li>"EN 10204 3.1" explicitly on the enquiry</li> <li>Heat-number preference (specific / any in-stock heat)</li> <li>Third-party inspection: none / SGS / BV / TÜV</li> <li>Destination + EU origin-declaration need (yes/no)</li> </ol> <p>Reply within 24 working hours: live heat availability + EXW/FOB quote + doc plan.</p> <hr> <p><strong>About:</strong> Baoji Titanium Valley inventory holder. ~400 tons titanium plate within 800-ton total stock. Gr2/TA2 titanium plate supplied with EN 10204 Type 3.1 mill certificate — heat-number traceable, actual chemistry/mechanical values, cut-to-size, export packed, same-day dispatch on confirmed in-stock orders.

Get a Free Quote

Tell us your requirement — grade, size and quantity. We reply within 24 hours.

Captcha code

Prefer chat? WhatsApp +86 188 2967 9311 or email sales@sxqytd.com.