| Specification | ASTM B265 (Ti plate), B338 (Ti tube), B550 (Zr bar), B523 (Zr tube) |
|---|---|
| Applicable Standard | Titanium Gr2 (UNS R50400) vs Zirconium 702 (UNS R60702) |
| Material Condition | Acetic acid (CH3COOH), acetic anhydride, vinyl acetate production |
| Inspection & Packaging | Titanium below 200C clean acid; Zirconium above 200C or with contaminants |
| Reference Price | $14.99 |
Product Description: Titanium Gr2 for acetic acid below 200C, Zirconium 702 (UNS R60702) for service above 200C or with formic acid and chloride contaminants. ASTM B265 B523 material selection guide.
| Item | Detail |
| Standards | ASTM B265 (Ti plate), B338 (Ti tube), B550 (Zr bar), B523 (Zr tube), B658 (Zr pipe) |
| Materials | Titanium Gr2 (UNS R50400) vs Zirconium 702 (UNS R60702) |
| Service | Acetic acid (CH3COOH), acetic anhydride, vinyl acetate production |
| Core distinction | TiO2 film breaks down above 200C in acetic acid; ZrO2 film remains stable. Ti and Zr cannot be directly welded. |
In 2020, a chemical plant in Shandong reported tube leakage in a titanium (Gr2) heat exchanger processing acetic acid at 210°C. The acid was "commercial grade" — 99.7% acetic acid with trace formic acid (0.1–0.3%) and chloride contamination (50–100 ppm). After 3 years of service, the tubes developed pinhole leaks at the tube-to-tube-sheet crevices.
The diagnosis: crevice corrosion. At 210°C, in the presence of formic acid and chloride contamination, the TiO2 passive film on Grade 2 titanium broke down in the tube-sheet expansion gaps. The mechanism is the same as in seawater — oxygen depletion, pH drop, chloride concentration — but accelerated by the organic acid environment and higher temperature.
The plant's response: replace the tube bundle with Zirconium 702 (UNS R60702). Zirconium forms a ZrO2 passive film that is thermodynamically more stable than TiO2 in hot acetic acid — it does not break down at 210°C, even with formic acid and chloride contamination. The cost: 4x the titanium bundle price. The result: 5 years and counting, no corrosion.
This case defines the central question: titanium and zirconium are both "corrosion-resistant" materials, but they are not interchangeable. The boundary is defined by temperature, acid purity, and contaminant level.
| Property | Titanium Gr2 | Zirconium 702 |
| UNS | R50400 | R60702 |
| Composition | CP titanium (Ti 99.2% min) | CP zirconium (Zr+Hf 99.2% min) |
| Passive film | TiO2 | ZrO2 |
| UTS (min) | 345 MPa | 379 MPa |
| Yield (min) | 275 MPa | 207 MPa |
| Density | 4.51 g/cm3 | 6.53 g/cm3 |
| Cost index (vs Ti) | 1.0 | 3–5x per kg |
| Acetic acid limit | ~200°C (clean) | Boiling, all concentrations |
Zirconium 702 is commercially pure zirconium. Its passive film (ZrO2) is more stable than TiO2 in many aggressive acid environments — particularly acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid at elevated temperatures. The corrosion rate of Zr702 in boiling glacial acetic acid is below 0.001 mm/year.
Titanium's TiO2 passive film is stable in acetic acid at moderate temperatures. Below 200°C, in clean acetic acid (no formic acid, no chloride), Grade 2 titanium performs well — corrosion rates are below 0.01 mm/year. The problem arises in the conditions that real plants encounter:
The mechanism is the same as in seawater: crevice geometry → oxygen depletion → pH drop → chloride concentration → TiO2 breakdown → galvanic acceleration. The difference is the temperature threshold — in pure acetic acid, the threshold is ~200°C; with contaminants, it drops to ~150°C.
Titanium (Gr2, or Gr7 for crevice zones) is the correct material for:
In these conditions, titanium's TiO2 film is stable and self-healing. Grade 2 is the economical choice for the bulk of the equipment. Grade 7 (Ti-0.15Pd) should be specified for crevice zones above 100°C, following the same zonal approach as in seawater service.
Titanium is at risk in:
Key point: The failure is crevice corrosion — same as in seawater, but the threshold temperature is lower because organic acid contamination accelerates the mechanism. The failure is insidious: the tube body looks fine, the first sign is a pinhole leak at the tube-sheet joint. Hydrogen embrittlement is also a risk: titanium absorbs hydrogen in reducing acid environments, forming brittle titanium hydride. Zirconium does not suffer this mechanism.
Zirconium 702 is the correct material for:
The ZrO2 passive film on zirconium is thermodynamically more stable than TiO2 in hot acetic acid. It does not break down at 210°C, even with formic acid and chloride contamination. Zirconium is essentially immune to acetic acid corrosion at all practical temperatures and concentrations. Additionally, zirconium does not absorb hydrogen in reducing acid environments, eliminating the hydrogen embrittlement risk that affects titanium.
| Temp | Acid condition | Material | Reason |
| Below 100°C | Any acetic acid | Ti Gr2 | TiO2 stable, economical |
| 100–200°C | Clean glacial AcOH | Ti Gr2 (Gr7 for crevices) | TiO2 stable, manage crevice risk |
| 100–200°C | AcOH + formic/chloride | Ti Gr7 or Zr 702 | TiO2 at risk in crevices with contaminants |
| Above 200°C | Clean glacial AcOH | Zr 702 | TiO2 breakdown threshold |
| Above 200°C | AcOH + any contaminant | Zr 702 | No risk with ZrO2 |
| Any temp | Acetic anhydride | Zr 702 | TiO2 cannot repassivate (no water) |
Note: "Clean" acetic acid means pharmaceutical or synthetic grade with formic acid below 0.05% and chloride below 10 ppm. "Commercial" acetic acid typically has 0.1–0.3% formic acid and 50–100 ppm chloride — this is the real-world baseline for material selection.
Zirconium 702 carries a 3–5x premium over titanium Gr2 on a per-kilogram basis. But the density difference matters: zirconium is 6.53 g/cm3 vs titanium 4.51 g/cm3 — a zirconium tube of the same dimensions weighs 45% more than a titanium tube. The material cost ratio for a tube bundle is:
Cost ratio = (Zr price/kg ÷ Ti price/kg) × (Zr density ÷ Ti density) = (3–5) × (6.53 ÷ 4.51) = 4.3–7.2x
For a heat exchanger tube bundle, the zirconium option costs 4–7x the titanium option. But:
For high-temperature or contaminated acetic acid service, the zirconium premium is justified by:
Conversely, specifying zirconium for the entire system — including the 80% of components that operate below 200°C in clean acid — pays for a premium that is not needed. The material boundary approach (Ti below, Zr above) is the correct economic and engineering answer.
The boundary between titanium and zirconium is defined by the process conditions:
The material boundary should be documented on the P&ID and verified on MTRs for each component. A common procurement error is to specify "corrosion-resistant alloy" or "CRA" on the material order — this is ambiguous and defaults to the cheaper option (titanium), which may be wrong for the high-temperature zone.
Titanium and zirconium have similar fabrication characteristics but critical differences:
Titanium welding: TIG (GTAW) with ERTi-2 filler. Standard shielding: torch + trailing + root purge (argon). No preheat; interpass below 200°C. Post-weld: no heat treatment required.
Zirconium welding: TIG (GTAW) with ERZr-2 filler (AWS A5.24). Shielding requirements are MORE stringent than titanium: zirconium is more reactive with oxygen and nitrogen at elevated temperatures. Triple shielding (torch + trailing + root purge) is mandatory; even brief atmospheric exposure during welding causes oxidation discoloration and property degradation. Cleanliness is critical: all surfaces within 25 mm of the weld must be degreased and pickled before welding. No preheat; interpass below 150°C. Post-weld: light pickling to remove oxidation tint.
Bimetallic Ti/Zr welding — NOT recommended. Titanium and zirconium form brittle intermetallic compounds at the weld interface. The transition between Ti and Zr should be a flange joint, not a direct weld. If a weld transition is unavoidable, use an explosively bonded Ti/Zr clad transition piece with Ti-to-Ti and Zr-to-Zr welds on either side.
Forming: Both materials have good cold formability. Zirconium work-hardens more rapidly than titanium, requiring more intermediate annealing in deep forming operations.
Approximately 200°C in clean glacial acetic acid. With formic acid contamination above 0.1% or chloride contamination above 50 ppm, the limit drops to approximately 150°C. Above these thresholds, specify zirconium.
Zirconium 702 (UNS R60702) is commercially pure zirconium, the most widely used grade for chemical processing. It forms a highly stable ZrO2 passive film that resists acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and other aggressive media at temperatures where titanium fails.
No. Direct Ti-to-Zr welding produces brittle intermetallic compounds at the weld interface. Use a flange joint or an explosively bonded Ti/Zr clad transition piece with Ti-to-Ti and Zr-to-Zr welds on either side.
On a per-kilogram basis, 3–5x. Accounting for the density difference (Zr is 45% heavier than Ti), the material cost for a tube bundle is 4–7x. For high-temperature or contaminated acetic acid service, this premium is justified by eliminating corrosion and extending service life from 3–5 years to 15–20+ years.
B550 (bar and wire), B523 (seamless tube), B705 (welded tube), B658 (seamless pipe), B553 (welded pipe). All list Zr 702 as UNS R60702. For zirconium plate, ASTM B550 covers bar and wire; for flat-rolled products, refer to ASTM B633 or the manufacturer's certified plate specification.
Acetic anhydride has very low water activity. Titanium's TiO2 passive film requires water for self-repair (repassivation). In anhydride service, any mechanical damage to the film cannot be repassivated, and the film progressively degrades. Zirconium's ZrO2 film is stable even without water, making it the correct choice for anhydride service.
Require an MTR listing UNS R60702 with full chemistry (Zr+Hf 99.2% min, Hf content listed, C below 0.05%, N below 0.025%, O below 0.16%). Cross-check with XRF spectrometry if the lot is large. "Zirconium" without UNS designation may be Zr705 (Zr-2.5Nb, different properties) or Zr-2 nuclear grade with different corrosion behavior.


Tell us your requirement — grade, size and quantity. We reply within 24 hours.
Prefer chat? WhatsApp +86 188 2967 9311 or email sales@sxqytd.com.
Contact Person: Wang Xiaoning
Tel: +86-917-355-7966
Email: sales@sxqytd.com
WhatsApp: +86 188 2967 9311
Company: Shaanxi Qianyi Tuoda Technology Co., Ltd
Address: Floor 4, Building 4, No. 188 Gaoxin Avenue, High-tech Zone, Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China